12-02-2019, 06:37 PM
(12-02-2019, 06:06 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Oh, I spoke against Trump's decision to pull out of Syria. I was just surprised in the allies I had in this critcizim.
But as the far Left thinks: Nothing wrong with an occasional slamming of good deeds.
As to what it looks like: Hit the back arrow and breeze through a few pages of this forum.
I have seen no one saying the Left is a problem; I see it saying too far from center (Left) is a problem. As to "never Leftisim" BS. I've already mentioned Dems I'd vote for over Trump.
Now your turn: What Dem candidate would you vote for Trump over?
1. So far, I would vote for all of them over Trump. Even Gabbert.
2. Speaking of "the eye of the beholder," you appear to assume any and every Dem is a "leftist." So if you voted for Biden or Klobuchar or Gabbert you'd be voting for a "leftist" and that refutes any charge of "never 'leftism.'" Tucker Carlson, deploying a similar definition of "the left," would agree with you. And you are posting on a thread titled "The Democtratic Party has moved to far to the left," which suggests someone IS saying the "the Left" is a problem. Perhaps "the far left" is now what used to be the left, and the center is "the left" now?
3. I have still see no examples of the "far left" slamming good deeds. And as I said above, if it has happened a couple of times, why is that even an issue with this president, now up for impeachment on charges of obstruction and abuse of power? We are not in a constitutional crisis because "leftists" have slammed Trump for good deeds. We are in a crisis because Trump tramples rule of law, and part of his base cheers that while the rest find it preferable to something called "socialism"--as Tucker Carlson defines it for them.
4. Don't understand the Syria reference in this context, or your surprise at "allies."
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)