Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
House Judiciary Committee v. Don McGahn
#3
(03-03-2020, 01:14 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Gotta imagine they are going to at least try to get it to SCOTUS.

So I don’t have to look it up, exactly what powers are given to congress in the Constitution in this area.

The opinion actually lays that out quite nicely:
Quote:Congress (or one of its chambers) may hold officers in contempt, withhold appropriations, refuse to confirm the President’s nominees, harness public opinion, delay or derail the President’s legislative agenda, or impeach recalcitrant officers.

I mean, the public opinion one isn't really a constitutional power, but the rest all tie back to the authority granted Congress in the Constitution.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR





Messages In This Thread
RE: House Judiciary Committee v. Don McGahn - Belsnickel - 03-03-2020, 01:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)