Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A great problem to have
#22
(04-17-2020, 09:59 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: I say trade back for that very reason.  When I heard that he was asked to do basically what Malik Jefferson did at Texas and he is "lost in coverage", I don't see Odell Thurman 2.0, I see a bigger and stronger Malik Jefferson.  

I don't want to be hearing for another 5 years how TEs and RBs out of the backfield destroy us.  

William Gay, who doesn't come without risk, has a higher rating against the pass than even Simmons.  And he would be available in the later rounds.  

No on Gay Jr for me, dude punched his QB in the face and cheated in college.

I want high character guys on this team.


(04-17-2020, 04:34 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: I wanna say Epenesa, but only if you are going to cut or trade Dunlap, if not then Murray or Baun.

Crazy, you don't cut Dunlap, just crazy talk. Are you alright YXD?


(04-17-2020, 04:54 PM)BURROWorBUST Wrote: Right. As good as he is, do we want to spend #33 on a guy who'd be rotational. DL line is not our most immediate need, though he might be fat out the BPA. Baun seems to be next on the list as BPA. He can rush the passer, play the run, and cover receivers. I don't se how we don't take him if he's there. That's if we go defense, of course. The WR talent that will be there and maybe the Oline talent would be hard to pass on. That's why I said this a great position to be in. At the same time, it's a hard position to be in. So many options. Hard to be wrong, but which would be best? 

(04-17-2020, 08:41 PM)Mobster Wrote: Waste of a pick. Players with his athletic profile don't make it as edge rushers. So maybe you think he can move inside in nickel situations, but he hasnt shown he can do that. Plus, you'd have to sit someone else  to do so. 

You'd be using a high draft pick on a situational backup player.

We are a 3-4 hybrid now guys with only 2 Ends Geno and Andrew Brown (maybe 3 if you count Dunlap).

Think this is a very overlooked fact.

People think we are specifically a 4-3 which is just not correct anymore.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
A great problem to have - BURROWorBUST - 04-16-2020, 01:01 PM
RE: A great problem to have - ochocincos - 04-16-2020, 01:34 PM
RE: A great problem to have - McC - 04-16-2020, 03:53 PM
RE: A great problem to have - SHRacerX - 04-17-2020, 09:59 AM
RE: A great problem to have - Jpoore - 04-17-2020, 10:41 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Jason_NC - 04-16-2020, 07:00 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Big Boss - 04-16-2020, 07:02 PM
RE: A great problem to have - SunsetBengal - 04-16-2020, 09:33 PM
RE: A great problem to have - JerseyDD09 - 04-18-2020, 05:55 PM
RE: A great problem to have - SunsetBengal - 04-18-2020, 06:18 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Gdale_Bengal - 04-16-2020, 09:53 PM
RE: A great problem to have - BURROWorBUST - 04-16-2020, 11:17 PM
RE: A great problem to have - BengalHawk62 - 04-17-2020, 03:59 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Mobster - 04-17-2020, 08:41 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Jpoore - 04-17-2020, 10:42 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Nicomo Cosca - 04-17-2020, 10:49 PM
RE: A great problem to have - BURROWorBUST - 04-17-2020, 04:54 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Jpoore - 04-17-2020, 10:43 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 04-18-2020, 04:05 PM
RE: A great problem to have - SHRacerX - 04-18-2020, 04:10 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Mobster - 04-19-2020, 12:52 AM
RE: A great problem to have - Jpoore - 04-18-2020, 08:18 PM
RE: A great problem to have - Nati#1 - 04-19-2020, 01:10 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)