Who ends up the "3rd WR" at the end of the season ?

[sandwedge]

(05-21-2020, 11:41 AM)Geno_Can_Dunk Wrote: You aren't necessarily creating another hole if you're using that roughly 1.3m of extra space to sign somebody else. It's shifting resources from somebody who will barely see the field to somebody at another position who will see the field. The whole point is to allocate resources where necessary, not a #6 WR whose return ability is redundant with other players (who we didn't have when we extended him). It's as if you're only looking at the subtraction of Erickson and not the addition elsewhere that that enables.

I do agree that we have lots of cap space so it may not be necessary. But I'm also saying if we want to extend Mixon, sign an OL such as Warford, sign a veteran edge, AND have money for injuries and roll-over for next year, some tweaking of the back end of the roster is a possibility. 

2 of our top 3 WRs are injuring prone, if they get injured again, you are relying on Boyd and Higgins and a bunch of nobodies.