06-07-2020, 03:09 AM
(06-07-2020, 01:50 AM)J24 Wrote: Let's try this again
1.) The issue was on the actual waiver.
2.) The NFL was filming it and Kaepernick was given permission to look over the footage and editing for it. I was incorrect on him bringing his own the crew.
3.) He was given a chance to perform for all 32 teams and he declined. End of the day that's more than most players ever get. All the issues he had seemed like minor issues that could have been worked out but he didn't want to for whatever reason.
4.) Obviously I'm not in the day to day of the NFL so I can't tell you for sure. I imagine if you trying out a player you would want to see if they can run your stuff especially at QB.
Again good day sir
The issues (plural) included the lack of transparency, the waiver, the date, etc. This wasn’t a private team workout conducted at the team’s facility. This was a workout for all 32 teams. So were teams going to see him run plays for all 32 teams using terminology from all 32 teams? No. Which means teams weren’t going to see him “run their stuff.” Plus it was scheduled for a Saturday in November when coaches and GMs wouldn’t be there. So the only thing the NFL would film would basically be a highlight reel which is already available for all the teams to look at. But, the big issue was the lack of transparency. Would you trust an organization that just settled out of court with you? Of course not. You’re gonna want witnesses to document what happens. We’re talking about the organization that won’t release any of the football PSI data they collected because it doesn’t support their Deflategate conclusions.
