06-15-2020, 05:19 PM
(06-13-2020, 08:37 PM)PAjwPhilly Wrote: No PFF did not.
PFF gave statistics, the article cited "said" that. And reading Baltimore Beat Down (i.e. an unaffiliated Ravens fan site) isn't where I would go for unbiased player analysis. I especially wouldn't use a slant article about re-signing him.
There is a reason that LJ Fort was given a bigger contract and Bynes was not.... Age? Nope they are both the same age. Bynes wanted more money? Nope. LJ Fort still makes more money... Draft status? Nope. Both were UDFA too. I am not saying LJ Fort is better just stating facts and providing some counter facts to that article's "superstar Bynes" reporting.
*not calling you out, but stats are stats and analysis is just that... I wouldn't judge Daniel Jones based a few facts off a Giants fan site. I think when we use facts to prove our case it is easy to provide 2-3. But that is not a PFF article.
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cincinnati-bengals/josh-bynes-9001/
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/baltimore-ravens/lj-fort-11206/
I stand corrected, good job.
