Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What Point Should A Team Move On From A Player
#44
(06-20-2020, 09:28 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: In the entire time Dalton was our QB I never remember a WR that left the Bengals say Dalton held them back.. Ross is his worst enemy and will have to overcome rhat himself.. Erickson still has the main punt returner and he is dependable not injury prone,, tough minded  and from your own point should also improve with better QB.

Why would a Receiver say a QB held them back?

In the end it is a moot point that you are stating, Ross will not be cut, it does not benefit anyone.

(06-21-2020, 11:57 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Actually the Pats have sucked at getting much production from thie WRs.

The Pats have drafted 17 WRs since Bill has been head coach and the 4th best on that list in career receptions is Brandon Tate with 71.  Here are some of the others.

1st round N'Keal Harry........12 career receptions
2nd round Chad Jackson.....14
2nd round Bethel Johnson...39
2nd round Aaron Dobson.....53
3rd round Taylor Price..........3
4th round Josh Boyce...........9
4th round Malcome Mitchell..32

Well, guys like Edelman I highly doubt would be as productive if they were anywhere else.

N'Keal Harry was a rookie last season and think he could be good down the road but not near as good as if he had Brady throwing
to him. Bottom line is a QB that can throw to a WR in stride and that is extremely accurate helps the WR. Burrow will help Ross IMO.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: What Point Should A Team Move On From A Player - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 06-21-2020, 05:41 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)