Bad Boys II

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(06-30-2020, 01:04 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Classic "straw man" argument.  Both Bels and Gmdino said they felt sorry for the kids and it was not a good thing that this happens.  But Leonard does not want to argue against that position so he claims that both are "fine" with it or "casually accepting".

The Constitution allows for people to peacefully protest.  That includes on public property infront of a person's home.  In this case the fact that it was a "private gated" community may have some effct on the lergality, but I am pretty sure that Leonard and Bfine don't care.  They feel that there should never be protests outside of a persons home.  But if I am misrepresenting their poasition I apologize.

To me this case is unique because the Mayor gave out the home addresses of her critics through the media.  To me that ends her right to complain about anyone protesting outside her house.

Classic "circle jerk" argument.

Quote:This is just me, but if a protest is on public property and is not a threat to public safety, then I don't care. Protest away

That's literally a quote from Bels. If that's not casually accepting or fine, what is? You can't be like "oh it's sure a shame" and then be "I don't care. Protest away." and pretend like you're not supporting the right to protest in front of people's private homes. But Fred does not want to argue against that position, so he just pretends they didn't say that and just focuses on the part where they said "a shame".