06-30-2020, 06:09 PM
(06-30-2020, 05:45 PM)Dynnasti Wrote: Really? You think paying $35k a month is fair to a guy who only sees his kid(s) Twice a month?
Child support is not a fee you pay in order to see your kids, and the less time the father has the kids the more he has to pay in support.
Support is based on a percentage of income. If your father is a multi-millionaire then $35K may be very reasonable.
(06-30-2020, 05:45 PM)Dynnasti Wrote: not without a fight and more money and often paying both parties attorneys fees and then you may not even get a reduction. Or worse you find it the kids not yours after your wife IS THE ONE THAT CHEATED and you STILL have to pay and lose all your stuff.
You are wrong. In Tennessee there is a requirement that there has to be a change of at least 15%, but if your income has dropped that much and it is not due to voluntary unemployment or reduced employment then you will get a reduction.
The issue of your wife having kids by another man does not matter because if you would have remained married to her you would have been responsible for raising them. Courts are hesitant to de-legitimize children of a marriage but it is now possible in many states.
(06-30-2020, 05:45 PM)Dynnasti Wrote: There’s Actual studies About how unfair the system is towards men as well as how LITTLE it actually costs to raise a child.
I don't know of any studies showing CS laws are unfair to men. Courts are more likely to give custody of new born infants to the mother, but that is not a child support issue.
And how much it costs to raise a child has nothing to do with child support. It has to do with a fair percentage of the parents income. A multi-millionaire should not be allowed to just give his child peanuts to be raised on.
(06-30-2020, 05:45 PM)Dynnasti Wrote: it’d be nice If you looked into before prosecuting some guy based on antiquated SKEWED data regarding CS.
I am not talking about any skewed data.
(06-30-2020, 05:45 PM)Dynnasti Wrote: This isn’t even taking into account the fact that men have next to NO options when it comes to birth control while women have what ... 10?
Ah. No we are getting to the real issue. Fathers who refuse to take responsibility for children because that is "the woman's job".
This is also why in the cultures that have high birth rates there are also extremely high rates of sexually transmitted disease.
(06-30-2020, 05:45 PM)Dynnasti Wrote: Let’s not pretend either that woman don’t trap men like this to maintain a lifestyle. Nobody is saying a kid has to live in poverty while his father is off jet setting. I’m just saying let’s be effing reasonable.
Okay. You make $10 million a year. How much would you plan on spending on a child if it lived with you and you were raising it?
What is reasonable to tell a child about how much his multi-millionaire father should provide to support him? What if his other kids are living with him in a $5 million house? Should he be allowed to treat his "new" kids better than his "old" kids?
