06-30-2020, 08:34 PM
(06-30-2020, 11:10 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Here is another example of labeling all protestors as "terrorists".
I didn't label anyone as a terrorist, please don't state I said something I did not. Terrorizing someone is not analogous to being a terrorist. I would think a child would find a large mob of angry people outside my house to be pretty terrifying. Hell, I'd bet many, if not most, adults, would feel the same way.
Quote:From what I can tell the protests outside the Mayors house were peaceful.
You mean after they forcibly tore down the wrought iron gate to trespass on private property?
Quote:This is not a good case to argue against a protest in front of a private property because the mayor started the problem by giving out home addresses of people that were opposed to her.
Wait, what? You are never allowed to protest on private property without permission. It's breaking a law called "trespassing". Also, the mayor started it? That's an elementary school level justification. While I wholly understand people being livid about being doxed, protesting outside her home is not directly comparable. Unless you're asserting that the people she doxed all had crowds of people protesting outside their homes as well.
Quote:You can't complain about people coming to your home when you have put the home addresses of your critics out in the media.
Sure you can, it's not a direct correlation. Is there a mathematical formula for when you're allowed to complain versus not? In any event, the whole discussion is rendered moot when the protestors forcibly broke an entering into private property and then proceeded to trespass to protest. This is a wholly separate issue to those of us who take issue with people (any people) protesting outside a residence (any residence) in a public area. They have zero right to protest on private property and they certainly have to right to break an entering into said private property to do so.
