06-30-2020, 08:46 PM
(06-30-2020, 02:30 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Agreed, but the Constitution allows for peaceable assembly and so if they are on public property and not a threat to public safety, then they have the right to be there.
I support the right to protest in front of people's homes if they are on public property and not a threat to public safety because that is a civil liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. You have a problem with it? Take it up with the framers.
I don't disagree with your logic, but I am saying that I think this could be an obvious area for a reasonable restriction. I see no damage in limiting the ability to protest outside a person's private residence. The White House? All day. Gracie Mansion? All day. A private person's residence because the blue check mark crowd didn't like one of his/her tweets, no, I'm not cool with that. Understand that I realize it's completely legal, I just think that should change. It's clearly not a direct analogy, but it reminds me of the right to throw a punch ends at my nose.