07-02-2020, 05:14 PM
(07-02-2020, 04:56 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Your thoughts mirror mine almost exactly. If enabling affirmative action was the goal then you would only need to strike "or grant preferential treatment to", from the state constitution. The fact that they axed the entire paragraph would indicate that is not their sole intent.
I'd say they just wanted to avoid the semantics argument that "granting preferential treatment" to one group is exactly the same as "discriminating against" the other groups.
What do you think their purpose is?
