07-03-2020, 12:17 PM
(07-03-2020, 10:36 AM)fredtoast Wrote: They have no legal basis to sue for a violation of their civil rights. If they did they could proceeed with that action.
47 USC 230 has nothing to do with ideology. It was drafted to protect against liability for damage from things like threats or libel or fraud that get posted on social media. Just like the PLCAA has nothing to do with ideology and was designed to protect gun makers from liability of damage done by crimnals using their guns. You can't pull a gunmaker's protection just because it prefers to sell guns to conservatives more than liberals.
You just did an outstanding job of saying what I already stated in the post I quoted. Violation of civil rights is not a basis of my argument and your using it, especially after I already mentioned this exact point, is an obfuscation and a dodge.
