07-22-2020, 02:53 AM
(07-22-2020, 02:20 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Was he not named in the legal stuff? No scary left wing media boogey man when they are naming names in a lawsuit and reporting on it.
He was named, not in dispute. The question was why.
Quote:Apparently the words and expressions he used on a message board made him racist. I didn't really care enough to dig in to the story. I took it at face value when I saw the headline.
What an outstanding consumer you are, kudos.
Quote:It just took me 20 seconds to find out what site he was posting on
You did a better job than CNN then. Share with the rest of the class?
Quote:to see he quit before he could be fired, and see tuckers comments where there wasn't a denial.
This part is actually factual, thank you.
Quote:I've been aware of multiple instances where advertisers have left tuckers show because he is a pos.
You spelled being threatened with a boycott wrong.
Quote:So I really didn't have a reason to instantly think this was some scary left wing media ploy to go hard core at poor little tucker. I'm interested to know why you think it is.
I already explained this, do you really need me to repeat it?
