07-22-2020, 11:30 AM
(07-22-2020, 11:03 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I would hope no one would do either, but we can comment on the apparent strength and validity of the allegations. Contrast the dearth of detail in the Carlson allegation with the overwhelming amount of evidence against Henry. Why do we have literally pages of factual evidence against Henry and a single page of "it was abundantly clear" allegations against Carlson with no details other than Carlson put on a leather jacket and was going to the office Christmas party? Was the investigation against Henry more thorough? I can't imagine that's the reason
It is not required that every detail is listed in the warrant. The complete evidence often includes hours of testimony from dozens of witnesses. Warrants would be several hundred pages if it was required to include all of that.
In fact there are often strategical reasons for not including every single piece of evidence in the warrant. Cases are often settled because the defendant does not want all the details to become public.
