09-20-2020, 04:47 PM
(09-20-2020, 04:19 PM)Whatever Wrote: Neither player is injured right now, so that really doesn't play into it. Maybe you look at it when cutting to 53, but not on who dresses. If you're not dressing a guy because he's injury prone and you're afraid he'll get hurt, he shouldn't be on the roster to begin with. Tate also has an extensive injury history going back to college, so it's not like he's proven to be durable.
As far as Tate catching the ball, they caught the exact same % of their targets last year. I'm not sure what you consider a negative play. They both fumbled once last year. Are we talking negative yardage plays? If we're talking incompletions as negative plays, they had the same catch%, so the same incompletion%.
Ross has a documented injury history in his time in the NFL, that's indisputable. Tate doesn't, to nearly the same extent.
You know damn good and well that Ross has dropped or simply missed a number of catchable, critical passes. You KNOW this. How many has Tate dropped? Catch % is not a be all end all.
It's these kinds of replies that start to piss me off and cause me to just say "**** it" and ignore them and move on. I'm not trying to take shots at you, just pointing out that you're twisting, contorting and omitting things..., for arguments sake? I don't know but it's maddeningly aggrivating to have to read all those words for something that dishonest.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
