10-14-2020, 02:03 PM
(10-14-2020, 01:37 PM)hollodero Wrote: Bels, for example, is quite the rational actor, and him being somewhat torn on that issue goes a long way for me to think it might not be just that catastrophic.
You shouldn't take me being torn as it not being catastrophic. I would say I am torn because I know it would be catastrophic. The rational, bureaucratic, process oriented side of me doesn't want it to happen and it wins out, which is why I'm not advocating for it. But there is the side that is tired of seeing the parties be playing the game with two different sets of rules, and kind of wants to see the board overturned and a refresh.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
