Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A kicker on the PS....
#6
(10-14-2020, 01:51 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: No, keeping 2 on the 53 is a major screw up. We SHOULD have had 2 on the PS from jump. Or signed a FA kicker to the PS when Bullock hurt hinself choking the SD game away. 

We claimed Seibert off waivers, instead, IIRC, which means he has to be on the roster, not the PS. 

I guess we can cut him when we get some guys on IR back (XSF, Daniels, Waynes). 

But if we place him on PS then anyone who loses a kicker can pluck him.

Let's be real: Who's losing out on the 53rd spot?
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
A kicker on the PS.... - sandwedge - 10-14-2020, 12:42 PM
RE: A kicker on the PS.... - fredtoast - 10-14-2020, 12:47 PM
RE: A kicker on the PS.... - Truck_1_0_1_ - 10-14-2020, 01:16 PM
RE: A kicker on the PS.... - bfine32 - 10-14-2020, 04:15 PM
RE: A kicker on the PS.... - Truck_1_0_1_ - 10-14-2020, 02:09 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)