Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Voters don't deserve an answer
#51
(10-14-2020, 11:20 AM)hollodero Wrote: Will be three.
Also, yeah I think this Garland denial was a step too far. Democrats would probably do the same thing now, but I am not so sure they would have done the same thing back then. For one, the centrist Garland already was an olive branch of sorts. While the GOP just nominates the most conservative judges they can find.

This has nothing to do with party affiliation. I am a foreigner, not a "liberal". But what republicans did to be 6-3 in the SC now was gangster and no retaliation just emboldens the bully to be gangster again and call you a loser. Imho.

The only reason the Republicans were able to do that was because the Democrats unleashed the nuclear option first in 2013, thus putting it on the table as a viable option with precedent...

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/mitch-mcconnell-triggered-nuclear-option-again-here-s-what-means-n990521
Quote:[/url]Has the nuclear option been used before?

[url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/mitch-mcconnell-triggered-nuclear-option-again-here-s-what-means-n990521#anchor-Hasthenuclearoptionbeenusedbefore]
Senators have threatened to go nuclear for decades. In 1957, Vice President Richard Nixon wrote an advisory opinion that helped lay the groundwork for the procedural move.


But no one pushed the proverbial button until 2013, when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., invoked the nuclear option to lower the 60-vote threshold to 51 for confirmation of executive branch nominees (such as Cabinet secretaries) and federal judges below the Supreme Court (such as for U.S. courts of appeal).

Reid justified the move by citing unprecedented obstruction from Senate Republicans, but members of both parties lamented the precedent it set. McConnell and Republicans repeatedly cited Reid's move as the basis for invoking the option regarding Supreme Curt nominees.



It's why Trump has a record number of federal judges appointed, and is about to shove through a third supreme court member onto the bench. I am pretty happy with a centrist SC and am not particularly pleased with the idea of a 6-3 majority (and a young majority at that), but 100% all of this was setup by the Democrats shooting themselves in the foot in 2013 and opening Pandora's Box with the nuclear option.


https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/191057-mcconnell-youll-regret-this
Quote:Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) warned Democrats Thursday that they’d regret using the “nuclear option.”

“You’ll regret this, and you may regret this a lot sooner than you think,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: jamarr-chase.gif]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Voters don't deserve an answer - PhilHos - 10-13-2020, 09:36 AM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - CJD - 10-13-2020, 03:25 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - CJD - 10-13-2020, 04:35 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - CJD - 10-13-2020, 08:57 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - CJD - 10-14-2020, 08:28 AM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - TheLeonardLeap - 10-15-2020, 04:41 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - Dill - 10-16-2020, 06:33 PM
RE: Voters don't deserve an answer - Dill - 10-16-2020, 06:26 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)