10-23-2020, 06:31 PM
(10-23-2020, 06:21 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Okay then.
Your entire argument seems to be that a "tyranny of a majority of states" is just fine, but a "tyranny of a majority" of citizens is not?
Why is that?
I didn't say anything of the sort, please feel free to pull a quote that states otherwise. The concept of tyranny of the majority covers both instances. The Senate is specifically designed to guard against the former, but also, albeit to a potentially lesser degree, the latter. Regardless, the concept, and my adherence to it, is not entrenched in either scenario.