10-26-2020, 12:02 PM
Never liked the thought process that goes behind "rewarding bad behavior". I suppose in certain cicrumstances it can be relevant, but in a situation like this one (and many others) it seems like the focus is on the wrong thing
They should not focus on how this affects (rewards) Carlos. Their only focus should be how it affects (rewards) them.
Carlos Dunlap is a locker room cancer, and an unnecessry distraction. He's also offering nothing when he actually sees the field. There is zero benefit in keeping him here, only negatives. There is, however, benefit in moving on.
That should be the main focus. Which route better affects our team, and the near 100 other people in our building, that is the question. Whether or not it rewards Carlos is irrelevant.
This type of logic reminds very much of the "we're not in the other business of making other teams better" trade talk response from the front office. It's not about the other teams, just like it isn't about Carlos. Quit focusing on anything outside of what makes you better.
Does Carlos Dunlap being cut or traded make our situation better? Yes. End of story.
They should not focus on how this affects (rewards) Carlos. Their only focus should be how it affects (rewards) them.
Carlos Dunlap is a locker room cancer, and an unnecessry distraction. He's also offering nothing when he actually sees the field. There is zero benefit in keeping him here, only negatives. There is, however, benefit in moving on.
That should be the main focus. Which route better affects our team, and the near 100 other people in our building, that is the question. Whether or not it rewards Carlos is irrelevant.
This type of logic reminds very much of the "we're not in the other business of making other teams better" trade talk response from the front office. It's not about the other teams, just like it isn't about Carlos. Quit focusing on anything outside of what makes you better.
Does Carlos Dunlap being cut or traded make our situation better? Yes. End of story.
