Minority rule

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(10-28-2020, 12:40 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The mods apparently deleted your last post and my response.

You suggested that California was the reason why someone can lose the popular vote and still win the electoral vote. I provided a host of examples of issues arising from the winner-take-all electoral vote system in place, which included showing how some larger states ended up having less voters than some smaller states and the imbalance of electoral votes to total votes without California being counted. This is within the context of losing the popular vote and winning the electoral vote.

I didn't suggest the election was invalid. You then brought up national voter turnout and suggested that I would have to reject all elections with lower national turnout, something that was nonsensical.

I understand that you realize that your response made no sense and it was designed to make no sense to avoid my actual points, but I decided to respond and clarify this anyways so that there is no need for you to respond to me with more gibberish. 

TLDR: You said the EC didn't make sense because Florida had more voters than Texas but Texas got more EC Votes. I said they only had more voter turnout, but less voters and less population. You then rambled on about not talking about turnout. Then you realized what you were saying made zero sense and so you decided to double down on the nonsense by pretending you didn't say anything you actually said.

Got it.

:andy: