Argument for and against Sewell.

[Jpoore]

(12-01-2020, 05:04 PM)KillerGoose Wrote: If you have a source for 90% of the pressure coming from IOL, I would be interested in seeing it. I haven't seen the discrepancy being that high.

I wish I knew how to post picks. But it was pff if I remember correctly. I have it on Twitter.

(12-01-2020, 05:04 PM)Au165 Wrote: God damn it, you guys are going to make me agree with Jpoore. I actually think a slide back may be in order here as there are actually 5 tackles in this class I think could be really good and while they may not be Sewell they can all be good starting tackles. The extra picks though have to address a pass rush, and potentially secondary, that needs a TON of help.

In My mock I went Farley at 8, Davis at 17, Leatherwood at 35, twyman at 67, weaver at 80.

(12-01-2020, 06:56 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: "We draft Sewell we end up with 4-5 wins. We trade back we’re a serious playoff contender."


Do i really need to explain? About either statement?

Yes. Bc what does Sewell do? He improves our rt situation but based on harts play this year not majorly. Meanwhile Davis provided a massive upgrade over our guard spot as well as leatherwood providing a decent upgrade over hart, not to mention the other pick or picks we got in a trade back for dline or secondary.

(12-01-2020, 07:08 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: How is a top 2 or 3 OA not an immediate upgrade?

I can see the other guys not being...but a top 2 or 3? C'mon man. 

No one is saying it’s not a upgrade...It’s an immideate upgrade. But is it more of a upgrade than say Wyatt Davis, Alex leatherwood, Caleb Farley, and say a mid 2nd round pick?