Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument for and against Sewell.
(12-03-2020, 01:11 PM)ochocincos Wrote: I totally get that POV.
My concern with that though is how many passes will Burrow have to do in order to win games?
The Bengals are averaging 40 passes per game this season.

Would it not be good for the defense to be better so that the Bengals don't have to pass as much, thus reducing Burrow's chances of getting injured?

Or maybe there's optimism that all the guys coming back from injury will turn this bottom-tier defense into a mid-tier defense. I don't have faith though, especially if they lose Lawson and WJ3.

Well, at some point Mixon needs to start earning that contract, too. Some semblance of a running game would be nice. And better OG’s would help with that.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Argument for and against Sewell. - Jpoore - 11-27-2020, 04:06 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:15 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:06 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 01:20 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 02:38 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 07:40 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-29-2020, 10:56 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-01-2020, 01:21 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - Nicomo Cosca - 12-03-2020, 01:15 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 12-03-2020, 12:31 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-13-2020, 09:50 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-18-2020, 02:30 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-17-2020, 10:48 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-22-2020, 07:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)