Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument for and against Sewell.
(12-15-2020, 06:07 PM)Whatever Wrote: I don't think you're getting an elite edge in the 1st in this class unless you get very lucky. Honestly, I think the cost to retain Lawson is being overestimated.  PFF recently released their Top 50 FA's, which contains 6 edges and he isn't one of them. 

I like a lot of the edge guys in the middle of the 1st but none are “can’t miss” guys like we have seen recently. Lawson will get paid because of a cross section of age and skill. Most the pass rushing edge guys this year are older where as Lawson provides long term upside.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Argument for and against Sewell. - Jpoore - 11-27-2020, 04:06 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:15 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-27-2020, 06:06 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 01:20 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 02:38 PM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 11-29-2020, 07:40 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 11-29-2020, 10:56 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-01-2020, 01:21 AM
Argument for and against Sewell. - BenZoo2 - 12-03-2020, 12:31 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-13-2020, 09:50 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - Au165 - 12-15-2020, 06:33 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-18-2020, 02:30 AM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-17-2020, 10:48 PM
RE: Argument for and against Sewell. - J24 - 12-22-2020, 07:22 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)