We can't even get a Penei.

[Whatever]

(12-27-2020, 07:58 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: I'm 100% on board with the trenches. I see that as a by-the-book plan, and a good one. Here is where my question lies. How often do you have a Rousseau, Hubbard, Lawson line in there opposed to Parsons being in every down?

Maybe i'm overthinking it? Maybe i'm assuming that Hubbard/Lawson will get enough pressure to allow a pick like Parsons. He's shown an ability to get pressure up the middle but how much do you want him rushing the passer? Penn St sent him a lot. 

I'm kind of thinking that if we're going to lose out on a "generational talent" in Sewell, i'd rather get another one at another position and Parsons fits that mold (projected), while Rousseau falls a bit short of it. 

Hopefully, that wasn't too many questions. lol

The thing with Rousseau is where do you play him?  When you look at his sack reel, the majority of his sacks actually came with him lined up over a G or the C, not from the edge.  Of the sacks he did manage from the edge, he was often the 2nd or 3rd guy in on the QB.  Some have said he may need to bulk up even more and move to 3 or 5 tech, which puts him squarely in project player status.