Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bengals bring back Frank Pollack
#88
(01-10-2021, 11:41 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Sack percentage can be a bit deceptive, when determining the quality of the OL pass blocking.  For example when Palmer was with the Raiders, Palmer wasn't very mobile or much of a threat to run.  His MO is to quickly get set, get through his read progressions, and get the ball out as quickly as possible.  Whereas if you have a mobile, athletic QB, they like to hold the ball a little longer, wait for something to develop or a running lane to open.  Even with elite talent on the OL, NFL defenders are going to get through after 4-5 secpmds/


I 100% agree that sack numbers can be very deceptive.  ProFootballReference lists "pressure%" for defenses but not for offenses.  But even those number can be deceptive if all a team does is dink-and-dunk in the passing game.

However, looking at the 2012 Raiders it appears that Palmer was trying to push the ball down the field a lot.  The players that ranked #1, #3, and #4 on the team in targets were all WRs with horrible catch% and high average per reception.

Denarius Moore..............114 tgt.....44.7 catch%.....14.5 avg
Darrius Heyward-Bey....... 80 tgt.....51.3 catch%.....14.8 avg
Rod Streater................... 74 tgt.....52.7 catch%......15.0 avg
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Bengals bring back Frank Pollack - IcoHolic - 01-09-2021, 07:33 PM
RE: Bengals bring in Frank Pollack - CJD - 01-09-2021, 07:36 PM
RE: Bengals bring in Frank Pollack - CJD - 01-09-2021, 07:39 PM
RE: Bengals bring in Frank Pollack - Au165 - 01-09-2021, 07:41 PM
RE: Bengals bring back Frank Pollack - CJD - 01-09-2021, 07:43 PM
RE: Bengals bring in Frank Pollack - Au165 - 01-09-2021, 07:38 PM
RE: Bengals bring in Frank Pollack - CJD - 01-09-2021, 07:40 PM
RE: Bengals bring back Frank Pollack - fredtoast - 01-10-2021, 12:03 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)