01-11-2021, 04:11 PM
(01-11-2021, 03:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You're kinda moving targets here to fit your narrative.
As you see it:
Goff regressed because the running game declined, not because Zac left
Tannehill got better because Zac left, not because the running game improved.
No, I just wanted to point out that he kept improving under different QB coaches. The point being that ZT isn't necessarily a luminary, can't miss QB whisperer at the NFL level. For all I know he might've kept improving under ZT. Again, passable QB coach != satisfactory HC. If he were "good HC" caliber, I would expect the body of evidence to bare out that he is obviously a cut above other QB coaches.
Maybe Goff did regress some because his current QB coach isn't as good as ZT - that wouldn't shock me. I was just trying to throw cold water on the notion that ZT and Goff were the focal point of that team. That running game and defense were monstrous.
