Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Report: Bengals apparently keeping the "B" logo
#31
(01-27-2021, 03:04 PM)ochocincos Wrote: While the Bears have the "C" as their official logo to represent Chicago, their alternate logo is a bear head.

I think this is more important than is commonly known.  I read somewhere (sorry, no link) several years ago that the reason the Bengals don't use the Roaring Tiger head much (at all?) anymore is because the NFL told them it looked too much like the Bears alternate logo. Bears had it first, I think, so they got to keep it.  It was likely the marketing arm; but still, the point was that the league and the Bengals want their logo to be immediately recognizable, not have people squinting to decide if its a roaring tiger or a growling bear.  This is a more serious problem with the size of logos on hats or details on shirts than for images on the field.

I like the roaring tiger, but I don't think that is really an option for those marketing reasons.  Therefore, you have the B or what was called the 'frolicking tiger' up thread.  I think the B narrowly wins that contest; but I'd be in favor of someone coming up with a really aggressive tiger that doesn't conjure images of the Bears (or someone else's) logo.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Report: Bengals apparently keeping the "B" logo - BRM13 - 01-27-2021, 04:40 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)