53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The

Hello, Guest! Register

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The

Murdock2420 Offline

Offline

Veteran

VIP Platinum

Posts: 5,598
Threads: 62
Reputation: 38730
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Mood: Zombie

Zombie

#25

08-10-2017, 04:50 PM

(08-10-2017, 03:36 PM)TKUHL Wrote: Lap seems to like what he's seen from him so far.

(08-10-2017, 04:05 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Lap said something like Nickerson is extremely smart and just picked up the Defense really fast.

Coach on the field type. This is saying something for a rookie UDFA...

If Lap likes him, probably should keep him around.

It really seems like Lap has the best eye for talent involved with this franchise. I'm sure he is happy as a broadcaster, but seems like a smart move would be to get him more involved with the team.

[Image: bengals08-1-800small.jpg]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-08-2017, 07:57 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Passepartout - 08-08-2017, 08:03 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - leonardfan40 - 08-08-2017, 08:05 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-09-2017, 01:01 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - BURROWorBUST - 08-09-2017, 04:46 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-09-2017, 07:48 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Wyche'sWarrior - 08-10-2017, 01:36 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Murdock2420 - 08-10-2017, 03:22 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-10-2017, 03:36 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-10-2017, 04:05 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Murdock2420 - 08-10-2017, 04:50 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Bengal Dude - 08-10-2017, 04:56 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - TKUHL - 08-13-2017, 03:37 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Murdock2420 - 08-09-2017, 05:49 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Storer50 - 08-09-2017, 06:22 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Lawless_1 - 08-09-2017, 07:44 AM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-09-2017, 02:57 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - McC - 08-09-2017, 03:46 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-09-2017, 03:52 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - sandwedge - 08-09-2017, 04:24 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-09-2017, 04:33 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-10-2017, 12:33 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-10-2017, 12:38 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-10-2017, 12:42 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - sandwedge - 08-10-2017, 03:56 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Lawless_1 - 08-09-2017, 07:25 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - ochocincos - 08-10-2017, 12:47 PM

RE: 53 Man Roster By Position LB's First. The - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-11-2017, 12:19 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)