01-13-2018, 03:05 PM
Everyone seems to like the changes so far with the exception of the obvious but it's pretty clear ML was finally givin more control. I find it alarming that a 15 year coach has finally been trusted to call some of the shots. My question is more about MB than Marvin, but let's say we win the AFC or SB within two years. Will this be all the proof you need to be convinced that MB has been the one to blame since taking over. If you like Marvin or not it doesn't matter, these next 2 years may be the most crucial in the next 25 years. I don't see him giving this amount of control to the next coach right away. Personally I think Marvin should have been gone years ago, but the current situation might be a blessing in disguise.
Mike Brown being stubborn and waiting this long to give a coach the tools they feel they need to succeed only make makes the case for a GM stronger. Also proves the narrative that Mike Brown is not committed to winning. As for Katie, I wouldn't expect anything other than what we've seen over the past 1/4 century.
Mike Brown being stubborn and waiting this long to give a coach the tools they feel they need to succeed only make makes the case for a GM stronger. Also proves the narrative that Mike Brown is not committed to winning. As for Katie, I wouldn't expect anything other than what we've seen over the past 1/4 century.
