01-15-2019, 07:28 AM
(01-14-2019, 08:35 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: I love that you attack me but, like many things, you have no real answers for any of my questions or things that I point out.
It's very childish, but I guess that's expected for someone that cheers for a known rapist.
As far as michael's post, fans care a lot more about the Ravens than they do the Chargers or Bengals.
If you look at the facts, the Chargers actually rank lower than the Bengals in terms of money generated, social equity, and road equity, meaning that the Ravens make the NFL a lot more money, which would play into my original post of the NFL favoring them.
Thank you for the attempted ridicule, as well as offering nothing of any substance, because it only strengthens my argument!
The reason why you think I have no answers is because you tend to simply ignore logic that doesn’t support your presupposed conclusions. For example, you will likely ignore this:
As your referenced article itself suggests, having a streak of success can affect the popularity of a team. With that in mind, if the league really were trying to interfere (and I am by no means suggesting they are) wouldn’t it make more sense for them to improve the status of the teams that are lower on that list? Over the years they certainly have done so in more legitimate ways: salary caps, draft orders favoring the lesser teams, etc. In the long run, having a ‘rich get richer and poor get poorer’ mentality hurts the overall league revenue. That’s why they have instituted practices that create parity. Your theory suggests that they are willing to frustrate their own efforts at that. Why would the league try to both encourage and discourage parity at the same time? It makes no sense.
Please try to answer the actual question without resorting to your irrelevant go-to points (e.g., ‘Oh yeah? Well your QB’s a rapist!’). Your tendency to do that (along with your wacky theories) is why so many people (including Bengal fans) don’t take you seriously. I have bolded the relevant point to help you focus.
