Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio
#19
(02-15-2019, 12:24 PM)ochocincos Wrote: If the team was in Win-Now mode (which you would assume they wanted to be by extending Marvin), it made sense to extend both Atkins and Dunlap. I think Mike Brown either already thought or was convinced by someone that the Bengals could be a true contender in 2018, only to find out it all backfired due to injuries and lack of depth or just pure good players in certain positions.

I would assume Grantham (and other candidates who have turned down the opportunity) asked about how they would be able to upgrade the defense (especially the LBs) and didn't like the answer given.

If you ask me, it says a lot about the guy's confidence in his own abilities.  Hey Taaaad, if we had a loaded defense, we probably would not be looking for a new DC.
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein

http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio  singersongwriterrocknroll



Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - Okeana - 02-14-2019, 06:42 PM
RE: Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - McC - 02-16-2019, 07:12 PM
RE: Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - McC - 02-16-2019, 07:24 PM
RE: Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - McC - 02-20-2019, 10:41 AM
RE: Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - McC - 02-14-2019, 11:37 PM
RE: Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - McC - 02-15-2019, 12:27 PM
RE: Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - McC - 02-15-2019, 12:40 PM
RE: Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - McC - 02-15-2019, 01:34 PM
RE: Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - J24 - 02-15-2019, 11:59 PM
RE: Bengals Turned down Jack Del Rio - McC - 02-17-2019, 09:08 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)