Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Time for Robo-Umps?
#9
(08-13-2019, 03:00 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Even umps have subconscious biases.  Pete Rose used to get good calls because he had a reputation of having a great eye.  If he took a close pitch with two strikes it was assumed to be a ball.  I'd say Votto got the same treatment when he was hitting like an MVP.

This is one big aspect people tend to discount and it's just human nature I suppose ?

As you say Pete Rose and Rookie X don't have the same stike zone. Tony Gwynn and Joe Bench Warmer didn't either. And it's still true today.

But I still agree more with Grampahol
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Time for Robo-Umps? - psychdoctor - 08-11-2019, 06:06 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - fredtoast - 08-13-2019, 12:48 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - grampahol - 08-13-2019, 01:50 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - psychdoctor - 08-13-2019, 05:18 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - Goalpost - 08-13-2019, 02:43 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - fredtoast - 08-13-2019, 03:00 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - bengalfan74 - 08-14-2019, 09:17 AM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - guyofthetiger - 08-13-2019, 03:08 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - psychdoctor - 08-13-2019, 05:22 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - bengalfan74 - 08-14-2019, 09:18 AM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - ochocincos - 08-14-2019, 10:05 AM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - fredtoast - 08-14-2019, 01:35 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - guyofthetiger - 08-16-2019, 01:24 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - fredtoast - 08-18-2019, 04:09 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - TheLeonardLeap - 08-18-2019, 07:40 PM
RE: Time for Robo-Umps? - fredtoast - 08-19-2019, 02:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)