Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why not O-line "specialists"
#20
(08-13-2019, 06:24 PM)fredtoast Wrote: It is no different from replacing a TE with an extra WR and bringing in the "3rd down specialist" RB, and every team in the league does that a lot.

No defense is going to be playing the run in 3rd and long no matter who we have on the field.

Which could be why the well executed draw, or gawd forbid, the shovel pass, is sometimes effective on 3rd and long.  It takes teams by surprise, and also makes a strong argument for why you might not want to sub out your run blocking OL for pass block specialists.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Why not O-line "specialists" - fredtoast - 08-13-2019, 02:54 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - McC - 08-13-2019, 04:26 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - jason - 08-13-2019, 08:01 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - PhilHos - 08-13-2019, 03:03 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - PhilHos - 08-13-2019, 03:26 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - PhilHos - 08-13-2019, 04:13 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - McC - 08-13-2019, 05:18 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - Au165 - 08-13-2019, 03:04 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - Joelist - 08-13-2019, 06:05 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - SunsetBengal - 08-13-2019, 07:55 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - RASCAL - 08-14-2019, 11:36 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)