Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why not O-line "specialists"
#25
(08-13-2019, 06:24 PM)fredtoast Wrote: It is no different from replacing a TE with an extra WR and bringing in the "3rd down specialist" RB, and every team in the league does that a lot.

No defense is going to be playing the run in 3rd and long no matter who we have on the field.

What happens when they check out of a run to a pass or vice versa?





[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Why not O-line "specialists" - fredtoast - 08-13-2019, 02:54 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - McC - 08-13-2019, 04:26 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - jason - 08-13-2019, 08:01 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - PhilHos - 08-13-2019, 03:03 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - PhilHos - 08-13-2019, 03:26 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - PhilHos - 08-13-2019, 04:13 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - McC - 08-13-2019, 05:18 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - Au165 - 08-13-2019, 03:04 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - Joelist - 08-13-2019, 06:05 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - rfaulk34 - 08-14-2019, 03:44 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - RASCAL - 08-14-2019, 11:36 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)