Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why not O-line "specialists"
#30
(08-13-2019, 02:54 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If both offenses and defenses bring in a different package of players for passing downs why not substitute O-linemen who are better pass blockers.

Teams already bring in different defensive backs, linebackers, and d-linemen.  Offenses bring in extra WRs and/or different RBs.  So why not different O-line packages for passing downs?

I keep hearing that some of our O-linemen are better run blockers while others are better pass blockers.  So we need to come up with a rotation that gets the most/best use of every player.

As has been said i am sure the O-line needs to have chemistry and you don't want to show your hand to what the Offense is doing. Makes it much easier for the Defense when you do this. Just need to have versatile O-lineman who can both pass and run block. Bottom line just start your best 5 O-lineman.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Why not O-line "specialists" - fredtoast - 08-13-2019, 02:54 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - McC - 08-13-2019, 04:26 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - jason - 08-13-2019, 08:01 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - PhilHos - 08-13-2019, 03:03 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - PhilHos - 08-13-2019, 03:26 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - PhilHos - 08-13-2019, 04:13 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - McC - 08-13-2019, 05:18 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - Au165 - 08-13-2019, 03:04 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - Joelist - 08-13-2019, 06:05 PM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - RASCAL - 08-14-2019, 11:36 AM
RE: Why not O-line "specialists" - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-15-2019, 01:57 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)