Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Passing this much is not sustainable
#33
(09-09-2019, 11:24 AM)Au165 Wrote: Seattle was 16th on the year, and Mychal Kendricks only played 4 games last year while dealing with the whole insider trading thing. In games he played they averaged 20 less yards per game on the ground (which was in line with top 5 yards per game averages). Now add in the fact that last year Seattle played Base formation only 34% of the time on average compared to the 71% of the time we saw yesterday, you saw a team who was committed to stopping the run. 

Again, you don't run into heavy boxes just to prove a point. The Seahawks obviously still were respecting the run late as play action was effective in the 4th, so not sure what the issue here is. 

The issue is trying to prove that Zac Taylor was not the right man for the job and that he will fail.  This is a get 'em in while you temporarily still can thread.

How about the fact that the HC stated he wasn't sure what Seattle would do on defense, so they had more than one plan in place and they went ahead and picked the proper one?  Sounds like some pretty sophisticated thinking to me.
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein

http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio  singersongwriterrocknroll



Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Passing this much is not sustainable - McC - 09-09-2019, 11:28 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)