"Improvement" vs. "fixing everything"

[Luvnit2]

(09-22-2019, 11:28 AM)fredtoast Wrote: I am not as down Zac as some here accuse me.  If you go back to when we hired him you will see.  Most of my concerns are about the staff, especially our DC.  I also feel the front offfice did not do enough to help Zac turn this around.  So I am not going to judge him too harshly this season.

However I do want to address one of the most common arguments I see from his supporters.  They say that there is no way he could "fix everythying" in his first year.  I agree with this, but say that even if he can't fix everything we should at least show some improvement from last year.  

So far we have looked better than I expected in one game and much worse in another.  It is impossible to decide anything based on just two games.  But as the season progresses I want to see some consistent improvement.  

I won't be happy if everything is not fixed this year, but as long as I see some improvement I will have a positive outlook for the future.

I judge improvement 1 way and that is wins versus losses versus 2018, the rest is all smoke in mirrors and mean nothing. If he wins 7 or more games he improved the team, if 6 or less he failed. I am not say fire him, but the roster was not blown up to rebuild so he should be able to do as well or better in wins as ML did.