10-14-2019, 12:39 PM
To anyone willing to look into it.
Who is the last QB that has turned around a 1-15/2-14 team without any extra picks or top 5 picks the last 17 years (with the exception of 2011), and only two "reliable" probowlers on the roster both over 30, that has turned the team into a legit contender?
The Mark Sanchez JETS?
The plug the top 2 qb into a bad team philosophy is why we see so many failed qb's taken atop of the draft.
Now the successful teams
NE, PIT, KC, Eagles, Texans, San Fran, Cowboys all plugged their qb into solid situations.
Seattle wasn't a successful team, but they got their qb late in the draft.
I can't think of a team where the plug in the franchise qb to a bad team with no free agents and no extra picks has worked.
But if that was the way, you sure wouldn't see the same teams picking in the top 5 each year as we tend to see, or the extraordinary failed rate of the top of the draft QB picks.
Who is the last QB that has turned around a 1-15/2-14 team without any extra picks or top 5 picks the last 17 years (with the exception of 2011), and only two "reliable" probowlers on the roster both over 30, that has turned the team into a legit contender?
The Mark Sanchez JETS?
The plug the top 2 qb into a bad team philosophy is why we see so many failed qb's taken atop of the draft.
Now the successful teams
NE, PIT, KC, Eagles, Texans, San Fran, Cowboys all plugged their qb into solid situations.
Seattle wasn't a successful team, but they got their qb late in the draft.
I can't think of a team where the plug in the franchise qb to a bad team with no free agents and no extra picks has worked.
But if that was the way, you sure wouldn't see the same teams picking in the top 5 each year as we tend to see, or the extraordinary failed rate of the top of the draft QB picks.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
