11-06-2020, 05:20 PM
(11-06-2020, 04:42 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Well if you just look at a players best games then you get back to my original point that Burrow is no better than the average NFL QB this season.
You list three games with a passer rating over 105. Eight QBs have at least 4 games with a passer rating that high. Burrow is just 1 of 17 that have had three games with a passer rating over 105.
His highest rated game was 112.5. This year 25 other QBs have had a game that good. 19 QBs have had multiple games with a passer rating as high as Burrow's single best game.
I mean, you said he hasn't been efficient. I provided examples where he was effecient.
Regardless of your definition of the word vs. mine, I don't think you can argue that he's look extemely good for a rookie. Especially a rookie with a terrible OL, a terrible run game, no elite WR1, and a bottom of the barrel TE.
Can we agree on that, that considering all of the above he's played outstanding for a rookie?
If we can then I'm not sure what argument you're trying to have. That Joe Burrow isn't an elite QB yet? I would definitely agree with that, as would most of the board I imagine. So what debate are we having then?
