Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
68.3 and 13
#25
(01-17-2021, 07:16 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-reveals-rosters-for-2020-pro-bowl-in-orlando-0ap3000001089218


Oh weird, why isn't Ricard listed as a RB? Oh that's right, because they're different positions. As a guy who boasts about seeing every Ravens game, I would think you would try to "at least know who plays what positions".


Pat, talk about personal attacks... your very first post after I made this thread was talking about how he gets scrutinized more because he is a black QB. You couldn't even wait 2 full sentences before trying to make this thread about race.... because no, I couldn't make this thread because he sucks in the postseason. Of course not. I must be scrutinizing him more because he is black. 


But sure man, enjoy putting yourself up on that cross because you were so wrongly personally attacked.


You came in hot, you came in wrong, you embarrassed yourself.


- - - - - - -

By the way, for your stats, JK Dobbins had 120 yards receiving this year. He also had 129 yards after the catch this year. So who should get more credit? Lamar Jackson for throwing -9 yards to JK Dobbins this year, or JK Dobbins for taking that -9 yards and running for 129 yards? 

Have a great Sunday.

Running backs include halfbacks, tailbacks, and fullbacks. Halfbacks and tailbacks are colloquially referred to just as running backs, which may be why you didn't know that fullbacks are indeed running backs. 

Your insistence on dodging the topic by not addressing the flaws exposed in your arguments and instead engaging in attacks is noted. 

As for your off topic question, the back should absolutely should get the credit on positive yardage off of a check down caught behind the line of scrimmage. Lamar's passes to Dobbins last night were all beyond the line of scrimmage, though, so I am not sure why you asked this question.
[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
68.3 and 13 - TheLeonardLeap - 01-17-2021, 02:22 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 02:47 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - TheLeonardLeap - 01-17-2021, 03:08 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 03:34 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - TheLeonardLeap - 01-17-2021, 03:58 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - Frank Booth - 01-17-2021, 04:33 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 04:58 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - TheLeonardLeap - 01-17-2021, 05:24 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 06:50 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - TheLeonardLeap - 01-17-2021, 07:16 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 08:46 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - Frank Booth - 01-17-2021, 04:30 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 05:01 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - rfaulk34 - 01-17-2021, 01:42 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 02:47 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - rfaulk34 - 01-17-2021, 05:18 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 07:08 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - jason - 01-17-2021, 04:58 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 05:33 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - GreenCornBengal - 01-17-2021, 02:36 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 02:47 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - GMDino - 01-17-2021, 11:50 AM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - Destro - 01-17-2021, 02:54 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - Joelist - 01-17-2021, 06:06 PM
RE: 68.3 and 13 - BmorePat87 - 01-17-2021, 06:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)