Oz and Walker

[*Nately120*]

(10-26-2022, 11:23 AM)masonbengals fan Wrote: How any responsible adult could watch that debacle & honestly believe that Fetterman is a better candidate for office than Oz is flat out bewildering to me.

I think Oz is a smarter version of Walker in the sense that you are voting for a celebrity with no experience, but you are trusting that person to tow the party line and in that sense it doesn't matter who you vote for as long as they are a literal button pusher for your side.

If Oz and Walker beat legitimately experienced political candidates, which they very well may, I'd wonder if the left doesn't go the same route of promoting celebrities, athletes, and inexperienced influences who will supposedly vote your way rather than actual politicians. Vote for this Twitch chick for senate and she will protect your right to choose AND send you a jar she farted in.

If people vote based upon one or two YES or NO issues, what is the point of trading popularity for experience? Vote for me and I'll do the one or two things you actually know about politics. Makes sense to me.

Dare I say Waker and Oz winning may lead to president Kaepernick. This country is getting close to seeing anyone with a political resume as a detriment to being elected. The part of me that finds insanity fascinating is on pins and needles.


EDIT - to more directly answer your question, even if Oz can better formulate his support of stuff people don't want they're going to vote for the other guy. Seems pretty simple. Maybe Fetterman is like the left's version of Walker...the guy has no brain but all he needs to do is vote for left wing stuff we want, so nuts to the articulate other guy.