10-05-2022, 04:35 PM
(10-05-2022, 04:16 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: The revenue that they were losing when defenses were allowed to destroy franchise QBs caused rule changes as it was a direct impact to revenue. The same line of thinking can be applied to concussion safety, as in if they aren't viewed as doing all that they can for player safety, they could be held financially liable to players and surviving families, as well as leave themselves subject to castigation by the activist crowd for being greedy corporate profiteers.
What franchise qbs did the nfl allow defenses to destroy?
And when?
