Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Genetic editing in humans
#21
(03-20-2016, 05:10 PM)Bengalzona Wrote: I am more about protecting the researchers and the research until it is ready for common use rather than preventing them from doing their thing.

Exactly. Research is a good thing. Thorough testing and investigation until results are well known is essential to advancement.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-16-2016, 11:11 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Rotobeast - 03-16-2016, 02:43 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-16-2016, 02:54 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Rotobeast - 03-16-2016, 03:36 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-16-2016, 03:42 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Beaker - 03-16-2016, 07:31 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-20-2016, 10:10 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Beaker - 03-20-2016, 04:11 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-20-2016, 05:10 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Beaker - 03-20-2016, 07:36 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-20-2016, 10:22 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-20-2016, 05:16 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - magikod - 03-16-2016, 08:34 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Rotobeast - 03-16-2016, 08:44 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-20-2016, 09:58 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - fredtoast - 03-21-2016, 08:55 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-17-2016, 02:58 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-20-2016, 08:19 AM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Beaker - 03-20-2016, 04:32 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-20-2016, 05:03 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - XenoMorph - 03-21-2016, 06:14 PM
RE: Genetic editing in humans - Bengalzona - 03-22-2016, 11:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)