07-11-2015, 09:13 PM
We took out top-rated TE in the draft, and Hill did most of his damage from a lone back formation, but I've been seeing sights that talk like we'll have a fullback in the game on most downs.
On ESPN, it even has our main formation for our depth chart as having a fullback. I've seen other sites similar to that, also.
Even CincyJungle talks like we won't have two tight ends on the field at the same time:
Sounds to me like they're saying Kroft won't have much value, which I'm not expecting him to light-it-up, but I think he could have a solid year.
Not to mention that a two-tight end set is the best way to attack the 3-4 defenses of the division.
(The article mentions how Rutgers switched to a run-heavy offense last season, which most likely explains Kroft's dropping as far as he did.)
Am I seeing this wrong?
On ESPN, it even has our main formation for our depth chart as having a fullback. I've seen other sites similar to that, also.
Even CincyJungle talks like we won't have two tight ends on the field at the same time:
Quote:While Eifert will be the clear-cut No. 1 TE, Kroft could be someone to keep on your watch list if Eifert gets injured. Still, a guy who didn't catch a single TD his final year in college isn't someone you should even consider drafting in anything outside of a deep dynasty league.
Sounds to me like they're saying Kroft won't have much value, which I'm not expecting him to light-it-up, but I think he could have a solid year.
Not to mention that a two-tight end set is the best way to attack the 3-4 defenses of the division.
(The article mentions how Rutgers switched to a run-heavy offense last season, which most likely explains Kroft's dropping as far as he did.)
Am I seeing this wrong?
![[Image: 7LNf.gif]](https://i.gifer.com/7LNf.gif)
