Bengals address need for guys who punch women in face depth

[*rfaulk34*]

(05-09-2017, 09:20 AM)Vlad Wrote: Tactic?
The tactic being used here is that Bengal fans are using the equivalency argument when there is none.

This fact that the bengals drafted a criminal and the Steelers or the Ravens didn't isn't a matter of convenience.
It is what it is.

Its a matter of inconvenience for you folks because you can't say the Steelers or Ravens did the same thing.

If you want to talk about Bengal players misbehaving vs.  Steeler players misbehaving, vs. Ravens players misbehaving that is for a different topic.

Mixon hasn't even put on a bengal uniform yet.

(Being seen in one of those gaudy costumes is a crime in itself LOL).

The equivalency argument is dependent on the parameters. "you guys" are sticking to 'they weren't convicted before they were drafted'. That's true. But it's also very limiting (what you're looking for) and, yes, convenient due to its limits and only being able to be applied to the Bengals. 

If a guy has been convicted, or is a criminal, does it matter to you when it happened?

P.S. Shut your face right up about uniforms, Clevelander.