Who will win the division?

[BFritz21]

(08-09-2015, 08:54 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: This is how brad argues:

1. He makes a HUGE overstatement

2. Someone points out that it was a huge overstatement and not true

3. He then argues a far lesser point and suggests that it makes his overstatement true.

This is where Pat's argument is flawed, as they often are:

In the runs I pointed out, which were the 60 yard runs, would he have gotten caught if he had to run 20 yards farther?  

No, you can't make that argument for all touchdown runs because defenses would be playing differently from closer yardage (say the 50 and in).

So, 60 when it was 80 wasn't a HUGE overstatement at all and was just a technicality when talking about his running/big play ability.

Here's how Pat argues:

1.  Find one minor incorrect piece of information.

2.  Act like it's the smoking gun to kill the entire opposition to his argument.

3.  Repeat the living shit out of it.

(08-09-2015, 10:06 PM)Bmoreblitz Wrote: Damn.....1st he wrongly says they lost Canty in his DLine argument. Then he gets called out for and says they're better without him.

Like I tell my Soldiers:
Ignorance is NEVER an excuse for stupidity.

So you can't counter to any point I made, just draw attention off of my points by posting like my post was stupid.