Climate Change Deniers

[treee]

(11-27-2017, 03:00 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: That is so far within natural variation that's it's practically a crime to make the claim.  To say nothing of whether man might not actually be 100% responsible for the 1 degree increase.

I'm sorry, but it's pseudo-science largely driven by an agenda.  They're ALWAYS revising some temperature subset lower to keep their claims alive.

You're right, it is an agenda.

 That is because the free market is not proactive, it is reactive. Therefor, there would not be enough incentive to move towards renewable energy until the problem had continued to occur for some length of time.

Once that point is reached, there could be monumental outcomes, such as the inability to sustain the necessary agricultural conditions to feed 7 billion+ people.

Also, the natural variation argument doesn't stand with context. You're looking solely at net change without taking into account the amount of time that transpires within that net change.