12-03-2017, 05:06 AM
(11-27-2017, 04:48 AM)treee Wrote: That is because the free market is not proactive, it is reactive. Therefor, there would not be enough incentive to move towards renewable energy until the problem had continued to occur for some length of time.
That is a great argument, even more so if it were actually true (tons of VC and PE money that disagrees with your assertion). If it were ever true, which would rarely be the case.
But the point remains that despite the "catastrophic" claims, the thermometer hasn't moved in 2+ decades. At some point, people MUST start questioning the validity and certainty of those "claims". I'm AMAZED by the parallels with all the Net Neutrality bullshit.
If you were to set politics aside and look at the case rationally and objectionably....I thing you'd probably agree with me.
--------------------------------------------------------
